アイテムの簡略レコードを表示する

Share 
 
dc.contributor.authorPutsa, Santiphong
dc.contributor.authorBoutson, A.
dc.contributor.authorTunkijjanukit, S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-21T07:16:30Z
dc.date.available2020-05-21T07:16:30Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationPutsa, S., Boutson, A., & Tunkijjanukit, S. (2015). Efficiency Comparison between Conventional and Vented Trap in Ghost Fishing Experiment, Si Racha Bay, Gulf of Thailand. SEAFDEC Technical Seminar 2015 (pp. 19-21). Samut Prakan: Training Department, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Centeren
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12067/1387
dc.descriptionraps are an effective and economically important multi-species fishing gear used widely for harvesting crustaceans and finfish around the world. The collapsible trap targeting blue swimming crab (Portunus pelagicus) has recently becomes a major type of fishing gear and operated over year in the Gulf of Thailand. Small scale fishers operate their traps inshore with the numbers of 200-300 traps/boat while commercial scale fishers operate further (offshore) with the numbers of 2,000-5,000 traps onboard. Both fishing types have possibilities become lost or derelict as a result of several processes. Lost traps are widely thought to result in mortality because of “ghost fishing” a term used to describe the process by which derelict fishing gear continues to trap organisms and induce mortality in an uncontrolled manner (Matsuoka et al. 2005). The phenomenon of ghost fishing is a concern to fisheries managers and the fishing community interested in long term sustainability of the trap fishery. The ghost fishing effects on the blue swimming crab and other animals from the trap fishing in Thailand have been very poor evaluated and reported. Accordingly, the objectives of this study were to examine the ghost fishing characteristics of the conventional trap used by small scale fishers compared to the vented trap. Specifically, the rates of entrance and mortality of the target species and the by–catch species were assessed and compared between both trap types.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTraining Department, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Centeren
dc.subjectConventional trapen
dc.subjectVented trapen
dc.subjectGhost fishingen
dc.subjectGulf of Thailanden
dc.subjectsmall-scale fisheriesen
dc.subjectBycathen
dc.subjecttrap fishingen
dc.titleEfficiency Comparison between Conventional and Vented Trap in Ghost Fishing Experiment, Si Racha Bay, Gulf of Thailanden
dc.typeConference paperen
dc.citation.spage19en
dc.citation.epage21en
dc.citation.conferenceTitleSEAFDEC Technical Seminar 2015en


このアイテムのファイル

Thumbnail

このアイテムは次のコレクションに所属しています

アイテムの簡略レコードを表示する